Thanks for the suggestion, Steve and sorry for not getting back to you sooner.
This does sound like a good idea and would be useful for a number of reasons (maintenance and general lifecycle reporting, etc). Would you expect to only have a single type of maintenance? Or might you have something along the lines of:
- Every x fills, inspect seals
- Every y fills, inspect another part
If, so we’d need separate running counters for each maintenance process really (this is what we do with vessels currently). It might be safest for us to build it this way, regardless, as this gives the most flexibility.
I’m linking to Cleaning records for casks/kegs as, although separate features, they may have some overlap on the implementation, so it’s helpful for us to have them linked. Cheers 